Quoting Thierry Reding (2019-11-08 10:55:03) > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:12:49AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > Sure a WARN_ON() sounds fair. That will not take the whole task down > > and makes sure that drivers aren't doing something incorrect. Otherwise, > > this looks good and we can optimize by caching the parent index later if > > we really need to. > > Okay, great. I'll go replace the above patch in the branch that I have. > I'm not sure if you saw it, but I had sent this in a pull request for > v5.5-rc1 about a week ago because I've got Tegra clock driver patches > that depend on this. I can replace this patch with the above proposal > and update the Tegra clock driver branch and then resend the two pull > requests. > > Does that sound like a plan? > Yes please refresh the PRs. I don't think anything else is concerning but I'll go do a sweep over the Tegra patches right now.
