On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 02:15:11PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > It is in fact optional in this case. This code remains solely for > backwards compatibility with old DTBs because back at the time the VDD > supply was associated with the DPAUX block where it should've really > been associated with the eDP panel. That should really have some documentation, and in any case would be better implemented by using the supply_alias feature to remap the supply to the panel device so that we're using the same code path when actually managing the regulator either way.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
