On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 14:43 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > [External] > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 01:04:42PM +0000, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 13:47 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > That v3 seems to be a small subset of this series? > > Ack. > > V3 is the first 4 patches from this series. > > Well, patches 3 & 4 are squashed. > > I am 100% convinced that the entire series is a good idea. Something happened here to the "not" word. Probably got lost in an alternate dimension ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ . Was supposed to be: "I am not 100% convinced that the entire series is a good idea." > > In the sense that a `struct spi_delay` may be a good idea, but at the > > same time, it may be un-needed. > > All I wanted to do, was to add another delay somewhere, and got lost in > > the rework of current delays. > > I thought about proposing just the first 4 patches [on their own], but > > I thought that showing the current series as-is > > now, may be a good idea as well [to gather some feedback]. > > I think it makes more sense to review as a whole series rather than only > a part of the conversion, it doesn't really help to only do part of it. > > Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something > substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much > easier to read and reply to. Ack. Problem is: I have to re-setup my email client every now-n-then since the work-email server has some issues with Linux email clients. And I sometimes forget to configure this. [ Exchange does not always get along well with non-Outlook clients ]
