On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:30:44 +0100,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Make coding style to conform to the kernel's standard by fixing checkpatch
> warnings about "line over 80 characters".
The last time I used a VT100 was about 30 years ago. I still think
this was one of the most brilliant piece of equipment DEC ever
produced, but I replaced it at the time with a Wyse 50 that had a 132
column mode. But even then, I could make my XTerm as wide as I wanted,
and things haven't regressed much since.
More seriously, I don't consider the 80 column limit a hard one, and
I'm pretty happy with code that spans more that 80 columns if that
allows to read an expression without messing with the flow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c | 15 +++++----------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c
> index 14dcacc2ad38..f829a5990dae 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static struct tegra_ictlr_info *lic;
>
> static inline void tegra_ictlr_write_mask(struct irq_data *d, unsigned long reg)
> {
> - void __iomem *base = (void __iomem __force *)d->chip_data;
> + void __iomem *base = lic->base[d->hwirq / 32];
(1) This is an undocumented change
(2) Why do you think that moving from a per-interrupt base that is
known at setup time to something that has to be recomputed on each
and every access is a good thing?
Thanks,
M.
> u32 mask;
>
> mask = BIT(d->hwirq % 32);
> @@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int tegra_ictlr_suspend(void)
> writel_relaxed(~0ul, ictlr + ICTLR_CPU_IER_CLR);
>
> /* Enable the wakeup sources of ictlr */
> - writel_relaxed(lic->ictlr_wake_mask[i], ictlr + ICTLR_CPU_IER_SET);
> + writel_relaxed(lic->ictlr_wake_mask[i],
> + ictlr + ICTLR_CPU_IER_SET);
> }
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> @@ -222,7 +223,6 @@ static int tegra_ictlr_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> {
> struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
> struct irq_fwspec parent_fwspec;
> - struct tegra_ictlr_info *info = domain->host_data;
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> unsigned int i;
>
> @@ -235,13 +235,9 @@ static int tegra_ictlr_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> if (hwirq >= (num_ictlrs * 32))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> - int ictlr = (hwirq + i) / 32;
> -
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
> irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
> - &tegra_ictlr_chip,
> - (void __force *)info->base[ictlr]);
> - }
> + &tegra_ictlr_chip, NULL);
>
> parent_fwspec = *fwspec;
> parent_fwspec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
> @@ -312,7 +308,6 @@ static int __init tegra_ictlr_init(struct device_node *node,
> "%pOF: Found %u interrupt controllers in DT; expected %u.\n",
> node, num_ictlrs, soc->num_ictlrs);
>
> -
> domain = irq_domain_add_hierarchy(parent_domain, 0, num_ictlrs * 32,
> node, &tegra_ictlr_domain_ops,
> lic);
> --
> 2.22.0
>
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.
