25.07.2019 12:36, Peter De Schrijver пишет: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 05:35:10AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> The PCLK clock is running off SCLK, which is a critical clock that is >> very unlikely to randomly change its rate. It's also a bit clumsy (and >> apparently incorrect) to query the clock's rate with interrupts being >> disabled because clk_get_rate() takes a mutex and that's the case during >> suspend/cpuidle entering. >> > > SCLK and PCLK certainly can change rate at runtime, although the code to > handle this hasn't reached upstream yet. Okay, maybe this patch is indeed not very worthwhile then. I'm leaving it up to you, guys, to decide.
