On 10/06/2019 17:43, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The clocksource rate is initialized only for the first per-CPU clocksource
> and then that rate shall be replicated for the rest of clocksource's
> because they are initialized manually in the code.
>
> Fixes: 3be2a85a0b61 ("Support per-CPU timers on all Tegra's")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c
> index 9406855781ff..830c66e2d927 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c
> @@ -277,6 +277,8 @@ static int __init tegra_init_timer(struct device_node *np, bool tegra20,
> */
> if (tegra20)
> cpu_to->of_clk.rate = 1000000;
> + else
> + cpu_to->of_clk.rate = timer_of_rate(to);
>
> cpu_to = per_cpu_ptr(&tegra_to, cpu);
> cpu_to->of_base.base = timer_reg_base + base;
Thanks. This fixes a boot regression we are seeing on -next with
Tegra210 (introduced by the commit referenced above). So ...
Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
