Re: [PATCH V3 6/6] i2c: tegra: remove BUG, BUG_ON

[Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 6/10/19 3:30 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 10.06.2019 8:08, Bitan Biswas пишет:
> > Remove redundant BUG_ON calls or replace with WARN_ON_ONCE
> > as needed. Replace BUG() with error handling code.
> > Define I2C_ERR_UNEXPECTED_STATUS for error handling.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> > index 4dfb4c1..d9e99b4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
> >   #define I2C_ERR_NO_ACK				BIT(0)
> >   #define I2C_ERR_ARBITRATION_LOST		BIT(1)
> >   #define I2C_ERR_UNKNOWN_INTERRUPT		BIT(2)
> > +#define I2C_ERR_UNEXPECTED_STATUS		BIT(3)
> >   
> >   #define PACKET_HEADER0_HEADER_SIZE_SHIFT	28
> >   #define PACKET_HEADER0_PACKET_ID_SHIFT		16
> > @@ -515,7 +516,6 @@ static int tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> >   	 * prevent overwriting past the end of buf
> >   	 */
> >   	if (rx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0) {
> > -		BUG_ON(buf_remaining > 3);
> >   		val = i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_RX_FIFO);
> >   		val = cpu_to_le32(val);
> >   		memcpy(buf, &val, buf_remaining);
> > @@ -523,7 +523,6 @@ static int tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> >   		rx_fifo_avail--;
> >   	}
> >   
> > -	BUG_ON(rx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0);
> >   	i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = buf_remaining;
> >   	i2c_dev->msg_buf = buf;
> >   
> > @@ -581,7 +580,6 @@ static int tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> >   	 * boundary and fault.
> >   	 */
> >   	if (tx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0) {
> > -		BUG_ON(buf_remaining > 3);
> >   		memcpy(&val, buf, buf_remaining);
> >   		val = le32_to_cpu(val);
> >   
> > @@ -847,10 +845,13 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >   
> >   	if (!i2c_dev->is_curr_dma_xfer) {
> >   		if (i2c_dev->msg_read && (status & I2C_INT_RX_FIFO_DATA_REQ)) {
> > -			if (i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining)
> > +			if (i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining) {
> >   				tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(i2c_dev);
> > -			else
> > -				BUG();
> > +			} else {
> > +				dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "unexpected rx data request\n");
> > +				i2c_dev->msg_err |= I2C_ERR_UNEXPECTED_STATUS;
> > +				goto err;
> > +			}
> >   		}
> >   
> >   		if (!i2c_dev->msg_read && (status & I2C_INT_TX_FIFO_DATA_REQ)) {
> > @@ -876,7 +877,10 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >   	if (status & I2C_INT_PACKET_XFER_COMPLETE) {
> >   		if (i2c_dev->is_curr_dma_xfer)
> >   			i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = 0;
> > -		BUG_ON(i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining);
> > +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining)) {
> > +			i2c_dev->msg_err |= I2C_ERR_UNKNOWN_INTERRUPT;
> > +			goto err;
> > +		}
> >   		complete(&i2c_dev->msg_complete);
> >   	}
> >   	goto done;
>
> It looks nearly ideal now, although there is still one thing that could
> be improved. We're going to print a error message in a case of RX and
> spew a warning on a similar case of TX, this makes code inconsistent.
> Let's switch to either a error message or just a warning in both places.
Agree. I shall share the updated patch.

-Thanks,
 Bitan