06.06.2019 17:02, Bitan Biswas пишет: > > > On 6/6/19 4:39 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> 06.06.2019 10:35, Bitan Biswas пишет: >>> Fix checkpatch.pl warning(s)/error(s)/check(s) in i2c-tegra.c >>> >>> Remove redundant BUG_ON calls or replace with WARN_ON_ONCE >>> as needed. Replace BUG() with error handling code. >>> Define I2C_ERR_UNEXPECTED_STATUS for error handling. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 67 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- >>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c >>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c >>> index 76b7926..55a5d87 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c >>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c >>> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ >>> #define I2C_ERR_NO_ACK 0x01 >>> #define I2C_ERR_ARBITRATION_LOST 0x02 >>> #define I2C_ERR_UNKNOWN_INTERRUPT 0x04 >>> +#define I2C_ERR_UNEXPECTED_STATUS 0x08 >>> #define PACKET_HEADER0_HEADER_SIZE_SHIFT 28 >>> #define PACKET_HEADER0_PACKET_ID_SHIFT 16 >>> @@ -112,7 +113,7 @@ >>> #define I2C_CLKEN_OVERRIDE 0x090 >>> #define I2C_MST_CORE_CLKEN_OVR BIT(0) >>> -#define I2C_CONFIG_LOAD_TIMEOUT 1000000 >>> +#define I2C_CONFIG_LOAD_TMOUT 1000000 >>> #define I2C_MST_FIFO_CONTROL 0x0b4 >>> #define I2C_MST_FIFO_CONTROL_RX_FLUSH BIT(0) >>> @@ -280,6 +281,7 @@ struct tegra_i2c_dev { >>> u32 bus_clk_rate; >>> u16 clk_divisor_non_hs_mode; >>> bool is_multimaster_mode; >>> + /* xfer_lock: lock to serialize transfer submission and >>> processing */ >>> spinlock_t xfer_lock; >>> struct dma_chan *tx_dma_chan; >>> struct dma_chan *rx_dma_chan; >>> @@ -306,7 +308,7 @@ static u32 dvc_readl(struct tegra_i2c_dev >>> *i2c_dev, unsigned long reg) >>> * to the I2C block inside the DVC block >>> */ >>> static unsigned long tegra_i2c_reg_addr(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, >>> - unsigned long reg) >>> + unsigned long reg) >>> { >>> if (i2c_dev->is_dvc) >>> reg += (reg >= I2C_TX_FIFO) ? 0x10 : 0x40; >>> @@ -314,7 +316,7 @@ static unsigned long tegra_i2c_reg_addr(struct >>> tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, >>> } >>> static void i2c_writel(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u32 val, >>> - unsigned long reg) >>> + unsigned long reg) >>> { >>> writel(val, i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg)); >>> @@ -329,13 +331,13 @@ static u32 i2c_readl(struct tegra_i2c_dev >>> *i2c_dev, unsigned long reg) >>> } >>> static void i2c_writesl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void *data, >>> - unsigned long reg, int len) >>> + unsigned long reg, int len) >>> { >>> writesl(i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg), data, >>> len); >>> } >>> static void i2c_readsl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void *data, >>> - unsigned long reg, int len) >>> + unsigned long reg, int len) >>> { >>> readsl(i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg), data, >>> len); >>> } >>> @@ -486,7 +488,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_flush_fifos(struct >>> tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev) >>> dev_warn(i2c_dev->dev, "timeout waiting for fifo >>> flush\n"); >>> return -ETIMEDOUT; >>> } >>> - msleep(1); >>> + usleep_range(1000, 2000); >>> } >>> return 0; >>> } >>> @@ -525,7 +527,6 @@ static int tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(struct >>> tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev) >>> * prevent overwriting past the end of buf >>> */ >>> if (rx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0) { >>> - BUG_ON(buf_remaining > 3); >>> val = i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_RX_FIFO); >>> val = cpu_to_le32(val); >>> memcpy(buf, &val, buf_remaining); >>> @@ -533,7 +534,6 @@ static int tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(struct >>> tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev) >>> rx_fifo_avail--; >>> } >>> - BUG_ON(rx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0); >>> i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = buf_remaining; >>> i2c_dev->msg_buf = buf; >>> @@ -591,7 +591,6 @@ static int tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(struct >>> tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev) >>> * boundary and fault. >>> */ >>> if (tx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0) { >>> - BUG_ON(buf_remaining > 3); >>> memcpy(&val, buf, buf_remaining); >>> val = le32_to_cpu(val); >>> @@ -680,10 +679,11 @@ static int >>> tegra_i2c_wait_for_config_load(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev) >>> i2c_writel(i2c_dev, I2C_MSTR_CONFIG_LOAD, I2C_CONFIG_LOAD); >>> if (in_interrupt()) >>> err = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(addr, val, val == 0, >>> - 1000, I2C_CONFIG_LOAD_TIMEOUT); >>> + 1000, >>> + I2C_CONFIG_LOAD_TMOUT); >>> else >>> - err = readl_poll_timeout(addr, val, val == 0, >>> - 1000, I2C_CONFIG_LOAD_TIMEOUT); >>> + err = readl_poll_timeout(addr, val, val == 0, 1000, >>> + I2C_CONFIG_LOAD_TMOUT); >>> if (err) { >>> dev_warn(i2c_dev->dev, >>> @@ -858,16 +858,21 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_i2c_isr(int irq, void >>> *dev_id) >>> if (i2c_dev->msg_read && (status & >>> I2C_INT_RX_FIFO_DATA_REQ)) { >>> if (i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining) >>> tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(i2c_dev); >>> - else >>> - BUG(); >>> + else { >>> + dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "unexpected rx data request\n"); >>> + i2c_dev->msg_err |= I2C_ERR_UNEXPECTED_STATUS; >>> + goto err; >>> + } >>> } >>> if (!i2c_dev->msg_read && (status & >>> I2C_INT_TX_FIFO_DATA_REQ)) { >>> - if (i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining) >>> - tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(i2c_dev); >>> - else >>> + if (i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining) { >>> + if (tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(i2c_dev)) >>> + goto err; >>> + } else { >>> tegra_i2c_mask_irq(i2c_dev, >>> I2C_INT_TX_FIFO_DATA_REQ); >>> + } >>> } >>> } >>> @@ -885,7 +890,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_i2c_isr(int irq, void >>> *dev_id) >>> if (status & I2C_INT_PACKET_XFER_COMPLETE) { >>> if (i2c_dev->is_curr_dma_xfer) >>> i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = 0; >>> - BUG_ON(i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining); >>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining); >>> complete(&i2c_dev->msg_complete); >>> } >>> goto done; >>> @@ -1024,7 +1029,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_issue_bus_clear(struct >>> i2c_adapter *adap) >>> } >>> static int tegra_i2c_xfer_msg(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, >>> - struct i2c_msg *msg, enum msg_end_type end_state) >>> + struct i2c_msg *msg, enum msg_end_type end_state) >>> { >>> u32 packet_header; >>> u32 int_mask; >>> @@ -1034,7 +1039,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_xfer_msg(struct >>> tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, >>> u32 *buffer = NULL; >>> int err = 0; >>> bool dma; >>> - u16 xfer_time = 100; >>> + u16 xfer_tm = 100; >> >> Why xfer_time is renamed? It is much more important to keep code >> readable rather than to satisfy checkpatch. You should *not* follow >> checkpatch recommendations where they do not make much sense. The >> xfer_tm is a less intuitive naming and hence it harms readability of the >> code. Hence it is better to have "lines over 80 chars" in this >> particular case. > Agreed. I shall share updated patch. Yes, please. >> >> Also, please don't skip review comments. I already pointed out the above >> in the answer to previous version of the patch. >> > I apologize for the oversight. I shall be more careful in future. No problems ;)