Re: [PATCH V3 4/8] memory: tegra: Add Tegra210 EMC clock driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



10.05.2019 11:47, Joseph Lo пишет:
> This is the initial patch for Tegra210 EMC clock driver, which doesn't
> include the support code and detail sequence for clock scaling yet.
> 
> The driver is designed to support LPDDR4 SDRAM. Because of the LPDDR4
> devices need to do initial time training before it can be used, the
> firmware will help to do that at early boot stage. Then, the trained
> table for the rates we support will pass to the kernel via DT. So the
> driver can get the trained table for clock scaling support.
> 
> For the higher rate support (above 800MHz), the periodic training is
> needed for the timing compensation. So basically, two methodologies for
> clock scaling are supported, one is following the clock changing
> sequence to update the EMC table to EMC registers and another is if the
> rate needs periodic training, then we will start a timer to do that
> periodically until it scales to the lower rate.
> 
> Based on the work of Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

[snip]

> +static int tegra210_emc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	unsigned long table_rate;
> +	unsigned long current_rate;
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	struct platform_device *mc;
> +	struct tegra_emc *emc;
> +	struct clk_init_data init;
> +	struct clk *clk;
> +	struct resource *r, res;
> +	void *table_addr;
> +
> +	emc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*emc), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!emc)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvidia,memory-controller", 0);
> +	if (!np) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not get memory controller\n");
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +	}
> +
> +	mc = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> +	of_node_put(np);
> +	if (!mc)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	emc->mc = platform_get_drvdata(mc);
> +	if (!emc->mc)
> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +
> +	emc->ram_code = tegra_read_ram_code();

emc->ram_code isn't used anywhere in the code.

I haven't checked other fields. Please remove everything that is unused.

> +	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	emc->emc_base[REG_EMC] = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
> +	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
> +	emc->emc_base[REG_EMC0] = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
> +	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 2);
> +	emc->emc_base[REG_EMC1] = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);

Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource().

> +	for (i = 0; i < TEGRA_EMC_SRC_COUNT; i++) {
> +		emc_src[i] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev,
> +						emc_src_names[i]);
> +		if (IS_ERR(emc_src[i])) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can not find EMC source clock\n");
> +			return -ENODATA;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "memory-region", 0);
> +	if (!np) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not find EMC table\n");
> +		goto emc_clk_register;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "nvidia,tegra210-emc-table") ||
> +	    !of_device_is_available(np)) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "EMC table is invalid\n");
> +		goto emc_clk_register;
> +	}
> +
> +	of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res);
> +	table_addr = memremap(res.start, resource_size(&res), MEMREMAP_WB);
> +	of_node_put(np);
> +	if (!table_addr) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not map EMC table\n");
> +		goto emc_clk_register;
> +	}
> +	emc->emc_table = (struct emc_table *)table_addr;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < TEGRA_EMC_MAX_FREQS; i++)
> +		if (emc->emc_table[i].rev != 0)
> +			emc->emc_table_size++;
> +		else
> +			break;
> +
> +	/* Init EMC rate statistic data */
> +	emc_stats.clkchange_count = 0;
> +	spin_lock_init(&emc_stats.spinlock);
> +	emc_stats.last_update = get_jiffies_64();
> +	emc_stats.last_sel = TEGRA_EMC_MAX_FREQS;
> +
> +	/* Check the supported sequence */
> +	while (seq->table_rev) {
> +		if (seq->table_rev == emc->emc_table[0].rev)
> +			break;
> +		seq++;
> +	}
> +	if (!seq->set_clock) {
> +		seq = NULL;
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid EMC sequence for table Rev. %d\n",
> +			emc->emc_table[0].rev);
> +		goto emc_clk_register;

Why do you want to register EMC clock if something fails? KMSG will be
flooded with errors coming from clk_set_rate.

> +	}
> +
> +	emc_clk_sel = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
> +				   emc->emc_table_size,
> +				   sizeof(struct emc_sel),
> +				   GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +	/* calculate the rate from source clock */
> +	current_rate = emc_get_src_clk_rate() / 1000;
> +
> +	/* validate the table */

Please be consistent and start all of the one-line comments with a
lowercase letter.

-- 
Dmitry



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux