Re: [PATCH V5 07/16] dt-bindings: PCI: designware: Add binding for CDM register check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/13/2019 8:45 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 3:25 AM Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 4/26/2019 8:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:49:55AM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
Add support to enable CDM (Configuration Dependent Module) registers check
for any data corruption. CDM registers include standard PCIe configuration
space registers, Port Logic registers and iATU and DMA registers.
Refer Section S.4 of Synopsys DesignWare Cores PCI Express Controller Databook
Version 4.90a

Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since [v4]:
* None

Changes since [v3]:
* None

Changes since [v2]:
* Changed flag name from 'cdm-check' to 'enable-cdm-check'
* Added info about Port Logic and DMA registers being part of CDM

Changes since [v1]:
* This is a new patch in v2 series

   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt | 5 +++++
   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
index 5561a1c060d0..85b872c42a9f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
@@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ Optional properties:
   - clock-names: Must include the following entries:
      - "pcie"
      - "pcie_bus"
+- enable-cdm-check: This is a boolean property and if present enables

This needs a vendor prefix.
Why only for this? Since this whole file is for Synopsys DesignWare core based PCIe IP,
I thought there is specific prefix required. Am I wrong? Also, CDM checking is a feature
of IP and DWC based implementations can choose either to enable this feature at hardware level
or not. And whoever enabled it at hardware level (like Tegra194) can set this flag to
enable corresponding software support.

TBC, I meant a Synopsys vendor prefix, not NVIDIA.

Any property that's not from a common binding should have a vendor
prefix. That hasn't always happened, so we do have lots of examples
without.
Ok. got it. I'm going to take care of this in V7 series.


Rob





[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux