On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 04:17:46PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
>
>
> On 15-Apr-19 6:50 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:33:41PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> >> AFI_CACHE* registers are available only in Tegra20, program them only
> >> for Tegra20.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> >> index 8e5fdc8ce3d6..cdaaf13a9fd7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> >> @@ -887,6 +887,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_pcie_isr(int irq, void *arg)
> >> */
> >> static void tegra_pcie_setup_translations(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> >> {
> >> + struct device_node *np = pcie->dev->of_node;
> >> u32 fpci_bar, size, axi_address;
> >>
> >> /* Bar 0: type 1 extended configuration space */
> >> @@ -927,11 +928,13 @@ static void tegra_pcie_setup_translations(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> >> afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_AXI_BAR5_SZ);
> >> afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_FPCI_BAR5);
> >>
> >> - /* map all upstream transactions as uncached */
> >> - afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_CACHE_BAR0_ST);
> >> - afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_CACHE_BAR0_SZ);
> >> - afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_CACHE_BAR1_ST);
> >> - afi_writel(pcie, 0, AFI_CACHE_BAR1_SZ);
> >> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "nvidia,tegra20-pcie")) {
> > At this point we've already matched on that compatible string, so we
> > could probably get that information from the SoC structure. Why are
> > these registers not available on later chips? How would we mark
> > transactions as uncached on later generations of Tegra?
> >
> > Also, typically writing to non-existing registers on Tegra186 would
> > cause an SError exception, but I haven't seen any of those with PCIe
> > on Tegra186. So do these really not exist, or are they simply not used?
> >
> > Thierry
>
> Do you want me to add new soc flag for AFI_CACHE registers?
>
> As per the HW team feedback, upstream requests targeting DRAM would
> be marked as cacheable when the address of the request are within the
> regions defined by the cache_bar_sz/st registers.
> All upstream DRAM requests are marked as non-cacheable from T30 to T210
> as the field is not used by MSS. In Tegra186 cacheable requests are
> supported by new register AFI_AXCACHE_0*. *
> These register definitions are not present in Tegra186 TRM, but
> register offsets are accessible, so these are not used.
> However Tegra186 simulations traps this register access because
> it is not defined in register spec.
Yes, I think something like .has_cache_bars or similar would be the best
solution here.
Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
