16.04.2019 5:32, Chanwoo Choi пишет: > Hi, > > patch6/7/8/9 are for handling of exception handling in probe() function. > Actually, I'm not sure that there are special reason to split out > the patches. I think that you can squash patch6/7/8/9 to only one patch. Indeed, I was rebasing and reordering patches multiple times and looks like there is no reason not to squash these patches now. > Also, even if patch6/7/8/9 handle the exception handling in probe(), > the tegra_devfreq_probe() doesn't support the restoring sequence > when fail happen. I think that if you want to fix the fail case of probe(), > please add the restoring sequence about following function. > - clk_disable_unprepare() > - clk_notifier_unregister() > - dev_pm_opp_remove() When all of 6/7/8/9 patches are applied, the clk_notifier_register() becomes the last invocation of the probe function and clk_enable() is kept at the first place of the probe order. Hence the sequence you're suggesting is already incorrect because error-unwinding order usually should be opposite to the probe order. It looks to me that the current final result of these patches is already correct.
