Hi Thierry, On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 16:28 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 04:25:53PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > There are cases where a driver needs explicit control over a reset line > > that is exclusively conneted to its device, but this control has to be > > temporarily handed over to the power domain controller to handle reset > > requirements during power transitions. > > Allow multiple exclusive reset controls to be requested in 'released' > > state for the same physical reset line, only one of which can be > > acquired at the same time. > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/reset/core.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > include/linux/reset.h | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > 2 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > Hi Philipp, > > the bulk of this is unchanged relative to what you had posted > originally. I squashed in the few things that we had already discussed > earlier (EINVAL -> EPERM) and a couple of minor fixes for issues that I > found while working with this. > > Attached is my fixup patch which contains all the changes I made on top > of your version and that I squashed into this. I have no further comments on this, I find all these changes either necessary or useful. regards Philipp
