11.02.2019 15:55, Wolfram Sang пишет: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:59:40AM -0800, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote: >> This patch adds DMA support for Tegra I2C. >> >> Tegra I2C TX and RX FIFO depth is 8 words. PIO mode is used for >> transfer size of the max FIFO depth and DMA mode is used for >> transfer size higher than max FIFO depth to save CPU overhead. >> >> PIO mode needs full intervention of CPU to fill or empty FIFO's >> and also need to service multiple data requests interrupt for the >> same transaction. This adds delay between data bytes of the same >> transfer when CPU is fully loaded and some slave devices has >> internal timeout for no bus activity and stops transaction to >> avoid bus hang. DMA mode is helpful in such cases. >> >> DMA mode is also helpful for Large transfers during downloading or >> uploading FW over I2C to some external devices. >> >> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I am not sure if you are aware of this document, so I mention it: > > Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations > > I am not pushing you to use the i2c_get_dma_safe_msg_buf() helpers, just > wanted to make sure you know about them. I am also fine with an > incremental patch on top of this if you want to add usage of those > helpers somewhen later. At least I was not aware of those helpers. It looks to me that the approach of having a statically allocated buffer is more optimal than having to allocate and map the buffer on each transfer. > That all being said, I'd accept the patch as is, except for: > >> +static const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra186_i2c_hw = { >> + .has_continue_xfer_support = true, >> + .has_per_pkt_xfer_complete_irq = true, >> + .has_single_clk_source = true, >> + .clk_divisor_hs_mode = 1, >> + .clk_divisor_std_fast_mode = 0x19, >> + .clk_divisor_fast_plus_mode = 0x10, >> + .has_config_load_reg = true, >> + .has_multi_master_mode = true, >> + .has_slcg_override_reg = true, >> + .has_mst_fifo = true, >> + .quirks = &tegra_i2c_quirks, >> + .supports_bus_clear = true, >> + .has_apb_dma = false, >> }; >> >> /* Match table for of_platform binding */ >> static const struct of_device_id tegra_i2c_of_match[] = { >> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra194-i2c", .data = &tegra194_i2c_hw, }, >> + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-i2c", .data = &tegra186_i2c_hw, }, >> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra210-i2c", .data = &tegra210_i2c_hw, }, >> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-i2c", .data = &tegra124_i2c_hw, }, >> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-i2c", .data = &tegra114_i2c_hw, }, > > Shouldn't this be a seperate patch? I asked for this change and no, it shouldn't be a separate patch as it adds "has_apb_dma = false" property for T186 that older Tegra's have as "true". Without this change T186 uses tegra_i2c_hw_feature of T210, see [0]. Hence this change is absolutely correct and appropriate for this patch. [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi?#n138 >> -static int __init tegra_i2c_init_driver(void) >> -{ >> - return platform_driver_register(&tegra_i2c_driver); >> -} >> - >> -static void __exit tegra_i2c_exit_driver(void) >> -{ >> - platform_driver_unregister(&tegra_i2c_driver); >> -} >> - >> -subsys_initcall(tegra_i2c_init_driver); >> -module_exit(tegra_i2c_exit_driver); >> +module_platform_driver(tegra_i2c_driver); > > This should definately be a seperate patch. While I am all for taking > it, are you sure it does not regress on older Tegra platforms? > All the patches are tested on older Tegra's (T20/T30 specifically by me) and we fixed several bugs that were regressing them over the few versions of the patchset. I specifically asked for this change for older Tegra's because the APBDMA driver (T20-T210) is getting registered from the module-init level and hence I2C driver probe is always getting deferred. I'm not sure that it's worth to factor out this hunk into a separate patch as it's directly related to the DMA support addition, maybe worth to mention why this is needed in the commit message.