On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:09:14PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 15/01/2019 15:10, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 02:26:02PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > > Right, I think with the current code we just shouldn't be checking for > > busy in teardown, since there's now a fairly big delay between idle and > > actually turning the hardware off the name is just super misleading and > > the logic confused. I don't have time to test right now but does > > something like the below which changes it to a flag for the hardware > > being powered up work: > I tried your change but the same problem still persists. OK, I feared as much with the stats not showing any activity. I do think it needs a cleanup still but probably won't help here.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
