On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:08:53AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:05 AM Thierry Reding > > <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:58:37PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x39ecc): Section mismatch in reference from the function tegra114_gic_cpu_pm_registration() to the (unknown reference) .init.rodata:(unknown) > > > > The function tegra114_gic_cpu_pm_registration() references > > > > the (unknown reference) __initconst (unknown). > > > > This is often because tegra114_gic_cpu_pm_registration lacks a __initconst > > > > annotation or the annotation of (unknown) is wrong. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > arch/arm/mach-tegra/irq.c | 4 ++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > I'm not seeing these. Do I need to enable any special options to trigger > > > these? Or are these just so new that I haven't run into them yet? > > > > My guess would be that this is a result of the CONFIG_NO_AUTO_INLINE > > option that is now available in linux-next. > > Okay, that would explain. It's not set in my configurations currently. > > Do you want to apply this to ARM-SoC directly with my Acked-by, or > should I queue it up for v4.22? I'm picking up a few others of these, so I'll include it in that batch. Applied to arm-soc next/soc. Thanks! -Olof
