Re: [PATCH 01/19] dt-bindings: clock: tegra124-dfll: Update DFLL binding for PWM regulator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/12/2018 09:25, Joseph Lo wrote:
> From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add new properties to configure the DFLL PWM regulator support. Also
> add an example and make the I2C clock only required when I2C support is
> used.
> 
> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt   | 73 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt
> index dff236f524a7..8c97600d2bad 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/nvidia,tegra124-dfll.txt
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ the fast CPU cluster. It consists of a free-running voltage controlled
>  oscillator connected to the CPU voltage rail (VDD_CPU), and a closed loop
>  control module that will automatically adjust the VDD_CPU voltage by
>  communicating with an off-chip PMIC either via an I2C bus or via PWM signals.
> -Currently only the I2C mode is supported by these bindings.
>  
>  Required properties:
>  - compatible : should be "nvidia,tegra124-dfll"
> @@ -45,10 +44,28 @@ Required properties for the control loop parameters:
>  Optional properties for the control loop parameters:
>  - nvidia,cg-scale: Boolean value, see the field DFLL_PARAMS_CG_SCALE in the TRM.
>  
> +Optional properties for mode selection:
> +- nvidia,pwm-to-pmic: Use PWM to control regulator rather then I2C.
> +
>  Required properties for I2C mode:
>  - nvidia,i2c-fs-rate: I2C transfer rate, if using full speed mode.
>  
> -Example:
> +Required properties for PWM mode:
> +- nvidia,pwm-period: period of PWM square wave in microseconds.
> +- nvidia,init-uv: Regulator voltage in micro volts when PWM control is disabled.

Maybe consider 'pwm-inactive-voltage-microvolt'.

> +- nvidia,align-offset-uv: Regulator voltage in micro volts when PWM control is
> +			  enabled and PWM output is low.

Would this be considered the minimum pwm active voltage?

> +- nvidia,align-step-uv: Voltage increase in micro volts corresponding to a
> +			1/33th increase in duty cycle. Eg the voltage for 2/33th
> +			duty cycle would be:

Maybe consider 'pwm-voltage-step-microvolt'.

> +			nvidia,align-offset-uv + nvidia,align-step-uv * 2.
> +- pinctrl-0: I/O pad configuration when PWM control is enabled.
> +- pinctrl-1: I/O pad configuration when PWM control is disabled.
> +- pinctrl-names: must include the following entries:
> +  - dvfs_pwm_enable: I/O pad configuration when PWM control is enabled.
> +  - dvfs_pwm_disable: I/O pad configuration when PWM control is disabled.

Please see Rob's feedback on the above [0].

Cheers
Jon

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/885328/

-- 
nvpublic



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux