Hey,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:09:41PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
> Convert warnings to info as not all platforms may
> have all the thresholds and sensors enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> index ed28110a3535..55cc1f2f6a45 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_set_hwtrips(struct device *dev,
>
> ret = tz->ops->get_crit_temp(tz, &temperature);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_warn(dev, "thermtrip: %s: missing critical temperature\n",
> + dev_info(dev, "thermtrip: %s: missing critical temperature\n",
I am mostly ok with your change in direction. But are you sure this is a
good thing? What about in the case that you have a platform that have
the crit temp and you really failed to .get_crit_temp()?
> sg->name);
> goto set_throttle;
> }
> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_set_hwtrips(struct device *dev,
> set_throttle:
> ret = get_hot_temp(tz, &trip, &temperature);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_warn(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing hot temperature\n",
> + dev_info(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing hot temperature\n",
> sg->name);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_set_hwtrips(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> if (i == THROTTLE_SIZE)
> - dev_warn(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing throttle cdev\n",
> + dev_info(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing throttle cdev\n",
> sg->name);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
