Re: [REGRESSION] brcmfmac: NULL pointer deference starting next-20181107

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



HI,

On 13-11-18 14:21, Jon Hunter wrote:

On 13/11/2018 10:40, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,

On 13-11-18 11:24, Arend van Spriel wrote:
+ Ard as this involves EFI.

On 11/12/2018 2:24 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Hi Hans, Kalle,

Starting with next-20181107 I am seeing the following NULL pointer
deference on Tegra (note the firmware is missing on this board) ...

[   14.072883] brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_alloc_request: using
brcm/brcmfmac4329-sdio for chip BCM4329/3

[   14.130287] brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: Direct firmware load for
brcm/brcmfmac4329-sdio.nvidia,cardhu-a04.txt failed with error -2

[   14.156283] brcmfmac mmc1:0001:1: Direct firmware load for
brcm/brcmfmac4329-sdio.txt failed with error -2

[   14.177769] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 00000008

[   14.197303] pgd = 60bfa5f1

[   14.211842] [00000008] *pgd=00000000

[   14.227373] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM

[   14.244244] Modules linked in: brcmfmac sha256_generic sha256_arm
snd cfg80211 brcmutil soundcore snd_soc_tegra30_ahub tegra_wdt

[   14.269109] CPU: 1 PID: 114 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted
4.20.0-rc1-next-20181107-gd881de3 #1

[   14.269114] Hardware name: NVIDIA Tegra SoC (Flattened Device Tree)

[   14.269154] Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func

[   14.269177] PC is at efivar_entry_size+0x28/0x90

[   14.269362] LR is at brcmf_fw_complete_request+0x3f8/0x8d4 [brcmfmac]

[   14.269369] pc : [<c0c40718>]    lr : [<bf2a3ef4>]    psr: a00d0113

[   14.269374] sp : ede7fe28  ip : ee983410  fp : c1787f30

[   14.269378] r10: 00000000  r9 : 00000000  r8 : bf2b2258

[   14.269384] r7 : ee983000  r6 : c1604c48  r5 : ede7fe88  r4 :
edf337c0

[   14.269389] r3 : 00000000  r2 : 00000000  r1 : ede7fe88  r0 :
c17712c8


Hi Jon,

I tried building drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c using tegra_defconfig.
Had to enable CONFIG_EFI. So the null pointer access is a 0x00000008
so I looked at the disassembly below:

int efivar_entry_size(struct efivar_entry *entry, unsigned long *size)
{
       310:       e1a05001        mov     r5, r1
          const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
==>  314:       e5936008        ldr     r6, [r3, #8]

So I think __efivars is NULL on your platform. It is private to the
source file. Not sure how the driver should deal with this. Maybe use
efi_enabled() but not sure what feature to use. My best bet would be
EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES.

Ah right, thank you for catching this I had looking into this
on my TODO list, but you beat me to it.

IMHO the best fix here would be to modify efivar_entry_size(),
adding:

     if (!ops)
         return -ENOENT;

Which makes it return the same error as when we do have efivar
support but the requested variable is not found.

So the above did not work. I see a patch from Arend and I will give this
a try.

Ah right, looking at Arend's patch my little snippet got the test wrong.

Hopefully Arend's patch will fix things.

Regards,

Hans




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux