On 24/10/2018 13:44, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 10/24/18 1:49 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 22/10/2018 12:19, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> On 10/22/18 12:52 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 02:22:53PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>>> From: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> The tps6586x driver creates an irqchip that is used by its various child
>>>>> devices for managing interrupts. The tps6586x-rtc device is one of its
>>>>> children that uses the tps6586x irqchip. When using the tps6586x-rtc as
>>>>> a wake-up device from suspend, the following is seen:
>>>>>
>>>>> PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
>>>>> Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
>>>>> OOM killer disabled.
>>>>> Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.000 seconds) done.
>>>>> Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
>>>>> Entering suspend state LP1
>>>>> Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
>>>>> CPU1 is up
>>>>> tps6586x 3-0034: failed to read interrupt status
>>>>> tps6586x 3-0034: failed to read interrupt status
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason why the tps6586x interrupt status cannot be read is because
>>>>> the tps6586x interrupt is not masked during suspend and when the
>>>>> tps6586x-rtc interrupt occurs, to wake-up the device, the interrupt is
>>>>> seen before the i2c controller has been resumed in order to read the
>>>>> tps6586x interrupt status.
>>>>>
>>>>> The tps6586x-rtc driver sets it's interrupt as a wake-up source during
>>>>> suspend, which gets propagated to the parent tps6586x interrupt.
>>>>> However, the tps6586x-rtc driver cannot disable it's interrupt during
>>>>> suspend otherwise we would never be woken up and so the tps6586x must
>>>>> disable it's interrupt instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prevent the tps6586x interrupt handler from executing on exiting suspend
>>>>> before the i2c controller has been resumed by disabling the tps6586x
>>>>> interrupt on entering suspend and re-enabling it on resuming from
>>>>> suspend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> So does this mean that the SPI interrupt for the PMIC can still be a
>>>> wakeup source even if it is masked? This is slightly odd because now
>>>> you're saying that this does work while it doesn't work for the RTC
>>>> interrupt. So is this an implementation quirk of the LIC/GIC on Tegra
>>>> which doesn't extend to the TPS6586x? Or am I missing something?
>>>
>>> What is the expected behaviour of IRQ disabling? Should it disable wakeup ability or only mask IRQ handling?
>>
>> I believe only mask the interrupt. However, the caveat here could be if
>> the parent interrupt controller actually supports wake-up. For Tegra it
>> is the LIC that handles the wake-up.
>>
>>> Couple months ago disabling of IRQ was disabling the wakeup, now something has been changed in kernel and wakeup isn't getting disabled. So either there was a bug before that was fixed or there is a bug now.
>>
>> Are you sure you were disabling the PMIC host interrupt? If you disable
>> the RTC interrupt in the PMIC's RTC driver, then this will prevent the
>> wake-up from occurring because you are masking the interrupt within the
>> PMIC and so it will never generate an interrupt to the host.
>
> I'm pretty sure (but not 100%) that was trying the same change as in your patch and it didn't work sometime before. If disable_irq() shouldn't disable wakeup, then everything is perfect now.
Please note that this is very similar to the following fix where I
experienced the same problem with another PMIC a couple years back ...
35deff7eb212 ("mfd: as3722: Handle interrupts on suspend")
I did not bother setting the enable/disable_irq_wake() for the tps6586x
host irq during resume/suspend because the irqchip for the tps6586x has
an irq_set_wake function that propagates the wake enable/disable.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
