On 03/10/18 10:52, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
>> static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct tegra_xusb_mbox_msg msg;
>> @@ -1038,7 +1095,7 @@ static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto put_padctl;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!pdev->dev.pm_domain) {
>> + if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "power-domains")) {
>
> I am assuming the original check was because allowing the two
> power-domains to be (wrongly) modeled as one (or as a
> master+subdomain)?
Actually, the original check was added to prepare for supporting
multiple power-domains and that once we had proper support in place the
'pdev->dev.domain' would then be populated. However, given that this is
not used in the case of multiple power-domains, I simply changed the test.
> I was thinking that, perhaps we should add a new OF helper function,
> where one can get the number of specifiers being listed in the
> power-domains property. Would that help to easier distinguish what to
> do when dealing with backwards compatibility?
We could do, but it is not necessary here, because we never had any form
of genpd support for the Tegra xHCI driver.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
