On 02/10/18 22:21, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added tegra_bpmp_resume function is unused when CONFIG_PM
> is disabled:
>
> drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c:847:12: error: 'tegra_bpmp_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> static int tegra_bpmp_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> Mark it as __maybe_unused to avoid the warning and let the compiler
> drop it silently.
>
> Fixes: cd40f6ff124c ("firmware: tegra: bpmp: Implement suspend/resume support")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c b/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c
> index 41448ba78be9..a3d5b518c10e 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c
> @@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int tegra_bpmp_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static int __maybe_unused tegra_bpmp_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> unsigned int i;
Arnd, is this seen with 32-bit ARM configs?
Timo, does it make sense to make BPMP dependent on ARCH_TEGRA_186_SOC
and ARCH_TEGRA_194_SOC instead of just ARCH_TEGRA? For 64-bit Tegra we
have a dependency on PM so this should not be seen for 64-bit Tegra.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
