On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:14:13 +0100 Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/07/18 12:17, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:42:20AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > >> > >> On 11/07/18 09:00, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:17:05PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 09/07/18 17:38, Aapo Vienamo wrote: > >>>>> From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> > >>>>> Move this to a separate file so it can be used to calculate the sdmmc > >>>>> clock dividers. > >>>> > >>>> Sorry for not commenting sooner, but what is the motivation for moving > >>>> this to its own file? I don't see why we need to do this in order to use > >>>> elsewhere. Furthermore, the original file is quite aptly named 'clk-divider.c' > >>>> and now we have a div71.c which seems quite specific. > >>> > >>> How else would you do it? > >> > >> Keep it in the same file? > >> > > > > That seems odd. clk-divider.c is meant to implement a clock type, not > > utility functions we happen to need in several types. > > I see, then why not have a clk-utils.c for stuff like this. I am painting > the bikeshed here, but div71.c seems very specific and I still don't > understand the 7.1 bit. While the code could work with other dividers, it was called 7.1 because the current usecases were only on 7.1 dividers. I can submit another version with a different filename if other changes to the series come about or if it's seen necessary to change div-frac.c from the latest version of the series to something else. -Aapo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
