On 9 July 2018 at 12:06, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday, July 2, 2018 9:08:06 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 29-06-18, 13:04, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> > Recently we added support to manage multiple PM domains per device. Consumer >> > drivers were provided an API, dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id() to associate its >> > device with one of its PM domain, by using an index. >> > >> > Let's extend this to allow the association to be done using a name based >> > lookup, which follows the similar concept as for other resource types, such as >> > clocks for example. >> > >> > Ulf Hansson (3): >> > PM / Domains: dt: Add a power-domain-names property >> > PM / Domains: Introduce option to attach a device by name to genpd >> > PM / Domains: Introduce dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() >> >> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> > > Do we need Rob to ACK the binding change? > Normally, yes, however, the change to binding is trivial and the concept of using a names property isn't something new. I would be highly surprised if he would object. I say apply it. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
