Remove checking of the CPU number for consistency as it won't ever fail
unless there is a severe bug in the cpufreq core.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
index 61f00d1cba26..147ae3e14f18 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
@@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
{ .frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END },
};
-#define NUM_CPUS 2
-
static struct clk *cpu_clk;
static struct clk *pll_x_clk;
static struct clk *pll_p_clk;
@@ -119,9 +117,6 @@ static int tegra_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
int ret;
- if (policy->cpu >= NUM_CPUS)
- return -EINVAL;
-
clk_prepare_enable(cpu_clk);
/* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */
--
2.17.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
