On 03/07/2018 10:06 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Wednesday 07 March 2018 07:50 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 03/07/2018 01:47 AM, Rajkumar Rampelli wrote:
While I am not opposed to ABI changes, the merits of those would need to be
discussed on the mailing list. But replacing "fan1_input" with "rpm" is
not an acceptable ABI change, even if it may measure something that turns
but isn't a fan.
If this _is_ in fact supposed to be used for something else but fans, we
would have to discuss what that might be, and if hwmon is the appropriate
subsystem to measure and report it. This does to some degree lead back to
my concern of having the "fan" part of this patch series in the pwm core.
I am still not sure if that makes sense.
Thanks,
Guenter
I am planning to add tachometer support in pwm-fan.c driver (drivers/hwmon/) instead of adding new generic-pwm-tachometer.c driver. Measuring RPM value will be done in pwm-fan driver itself using pwm capture feature and will add new sysfs attributes under this driver to report rpm value of fan.
There is an existing attribute to report the RPM of fans. It is called fan[1..n]_input.
"replacing "fan1_input" with "rpm" is not an acceptable ABI change"
Preemptive NACK.
The RPM is measured speed via PWM signal capture which is output from fan.
So should we have the fan[1..n]_output_rpm?
No. I hear you clearly that you for some reason dislike fan[1..n]_input.
While ABIs are not always to our liking, that doesn't mean that we get
to change them at our whim. If that is not acceptable for you, I can't
help you. And you can't change inX_input to inX_voltage either, sorry.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
