Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] cpufreq: tegra124-cpufreq: extend to support Tegra210

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:53:43AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 01/02/18 09:25, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:06:36AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >> On 24/01/18 12:45, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> >>> Tegra210 has a very similar CPU clocking scheme than Tegra124. So add
> >>> support in this driver. Also allow for the case where the CPU voltage is
> >>> controlled directly by the DFLL rather than by a separate regulator object.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++-------
> >>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
> >>> index 4353025..d631dc4 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra124-cpufreq.c
> >>> @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ static void tegra124_cpu_switch_to_pllx(struct tegra124_cpufreq_priv *priv)
> >>>  {
> >>>  	clk_set_parent(priv->cpu_clk, priv->pllp_clk);
> >>>  	clk_disable_unprepare(priv->dfll_clk);
> >>> -	regulator_sync_voltage(priv->vdd_cpu_reg);
> >>> +	if (priv->vdd_cpu_reg)
> >>> +		regulator_sync_voltage(priv->vdd_cpu_reg);
> >>>  	clk_set_parent(priv->cpu_clk, priv->pllx_clk);
> >>>  }
> >>>  
> >>> @@ -89,10 +90,8 @@ static int tegra124_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>  		return -ENODEV;
> >>>  
> >>>  	priv->vdd_cpu_reg = regulator_get(cpu_dev, "vdd-cpu");
> >>> -	if (IS_ERR(priv->vdd_cpu_reg)) {
> >>> -		ret = PTR_ERR(priv->vdd_cpu_reg);
> >>> -		goto out_put_np;
> >>> -	}
> >>> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->vdd_cpu_reg))
> >>> +		priv->vdd_cpu_reg = NULL;
> >>>  
> >>
> >> For Tegra124, don't we still want to return an error here?
> > 
> > Not necessarily. Also on Tegra124 the DFLL can use PWM and I think jetson TK1
> > can be reworked to use this.
> 
> Seems to me that we should use DT or soc-data to specify which is being
> used and then do the appropriate thing. I don't think that we should
> assume that because the regulator is not present we are using PWM.

I think we should rather move the sync logic into the DFLL driver in some
future series. The DFLL driver does know about PWM vs I2C regulator.

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux