Re: next/master boot: 296 boots: 62 failed, 230 passed with 4 conflicts (next-20171113)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/11/17 19:53, Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Guillaume Tucker
<guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 13/11/17 19:02, kernelci.org bot wrote:

next/master boot: 296 boots: 62 failed, 230 passed with 4 conflicts
(next-20171113)

Full Boot Summary:
https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/next/branch/master/kernel/next-20171113/
Full Build Summary:
https://kernelci.org/build/next/branch/master/kernel/next-20171113/

Tree: next
Branch: master
Git Describe: next-20171113
Git Commit: c348a99ee55feac43b5b62a5957c6d8e2b6c3abe
Git URL:
http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
Tested: 52 unique boards, 17 SoC families, 33 builds out of 213

Boot Regressions Detected:

arm:

[...]

    multi_v7_defconfig:

[...]

        tegra124-nyan-big:
            lab-collabora: failing since 9 days (last pass: next-20171102
- first fail: next-20171103)



There are several things failing on the tegra124-nyan-big, at
least I've isolated one with my latest bisection run:

6c78935777d12ead2d32adf3eb525a24faf02d04 is the first bad commit
commit 6c78935777d12ead2d32adf3eb525a24faf02d04
Author: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Nov 10 16:34:52 2017 +0100

    video: fbdev: Convert timers to use timer_setup()


These boot tests are with multi_v7_defconfig with CONFIG_MODULES
and CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU disabled:

* the first one on the revision mentioned above, fails:
  https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/987651

* then the same but with the commit reverted, passes:
  https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/987652

This was found using the still experimental automated bisection
tool for kernelci.org, I'm not sure yet how reliable the results
are.  I think the manual check with these 2 boots proves it, but
I haven't really investigated further than that.

So I then did the same tests at the top of the branch, on the
next-20171113 tag:

* next-20171113, fails but differently:
  https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/987653

* next-20171113 with the commit reverted, still fails:
  https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/987654

It's hard to tell whether the commit I mentioned got fixed
in-between, I guess it would be best to not have any boot failure
in any case.

The next thing I'll try is start a bisection for the other
failure see on next-20171113 tag, with the commit above reverted
and see if it leads anywhere...

Hope this helps!

Thanks for the report! I believe this is fixed with:

https://marc.info/?l=linux-fbdev&m=151056635200583&w=2

and that commit appears in next-20171114. Please let me know if that
doesn't fix it, though!

Thanks, I've applied this patch in-place and confirmed it did fix
the issue:

  https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/988891

Will move on to next-20171114 now.

Guillaume

---
For more info write to <info@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



_______________________________________________
Kernel-build-reports mailing list
Kernel-build-reports@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-build-reports






--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux