Re: next/master boot: 273 boots: 63 failed, 209 passed with 1 untried/unknown (next-20171106)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/11/17 09:55, Jon Hunter wrote:

On 08/11/17 16:42, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
On 08/11/17 15:57, Jon Hunter wrote:

On 08/11/17 15:19, Guillaume Tucker wrote:

...

After a few more automated bisection attempts and a bug fix in
LAVA, I've now found at least one potentially breaking commit:

  commit d89e2378a97fafdc74cbf997e7c88af75b81610a
  Author: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
  Date:   Thu Oct 12 16:56:14 2017 +0100

      drivers: flag buses which demand DMA configuration


I've run some boot tests manually with this revision and then
also after reverting it in-place, these respectively failed and
passed:

  * d89e2378, failed:
    https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/978968

  * d89e2378 reverted, passed:
    https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/978969


I then went on and tried the same but on top of next-20171108 and
found that they both failed

  * next-20171108, failed:
    https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/979063

  * next-20171108 with d89e2378 reverted, failed as well:
    https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/979167


So this shows there is almost certainly another offending commit
in -next.  The errors in both cases are not quite the same, the
last one is triggered by a BUG whereas the first one is a NULL
pointer (I haven't looked any further).  Also I don't think
there's any fix for d89e2378a97fafdc74cbf997e7c88af75b81610a
which is currently still in next.

This crash is a known issue [0] and we have been discussing this. Can
you try applying [1]?

So with next-20171108 + d89e2378a9 reverted + [1] applied:

  https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/979173

No visible kernel crash in the log but it hangs.


I also tried next-20171108 + [1] applied only:

  https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/979179

which also appears to hang.

Thanks for the update. I am wondering if it is one of the kernel modules
that is getting loaded because booting multi_v7_defconfig and loading no
modules does not hang for me. I will take a look but I might not get to
it until next week.

I actually built these kernel revisions with module support
disabled to speed up the builds, and no modules are being
downloaded in the LAVA job.

If you have a public URL with your known working kernel zImage
and dtb, let me know so I could re-run the same test LAVA boot
test to see if I get the same results as you (i.e. no hang).

Guillaume
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux