On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 18.10.2017 00:13, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Thierry Reding >> <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:13:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>> [...] >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vde.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vde.txt >>> [...] >>>>> +- resets : Must contain an entry for each entry in reset-names. >>>>> + See ../reset/reset.txt for details. >>>>> +- reset-names : Must include the following entries: >>>>> + - vde >>>> >>>> -names is pointless when there is only one. >>> >>> I'd prefer to keep it. In the past we occasionally had to add clocks or >>> resets to a device tree node where only one had been present (and hence >>> no -names property) and that caused some awkwardness because verbiage >>> had to be added to the bindings that clarified that one particular entry >>> (the original one) always had to come first. >> >> The order should be specified regardless of -names and the original >> one has to come first if you add any. That's not awkwardness, but how >> bindings work. > > Probably it would be okay to remove '-names' from the binding doc, but keep them > in the actual DT, wouldn't it? No. Then where are the names documented? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
