On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 07:44:12PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
>
>
> On 18-Oct-17 6:57 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:27:49PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:34:28PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 05:28:35PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> >>>> UPHY programming is performed by BPMP, PHY enable calls are
> >>>> not required for Tegra186 PCIe. Power partition ungate is
> >>>> done by BPMP powergate driver.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Tested-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> V2: Add soc->program_uphy check for phy_exit call
> >>>> drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>>> @@ -1012,10 +1016,12 @@ static int tegra_pcie_enable_controller(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> >>>> afi_writel(pcie, value, AFI_FUSE);
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> - err = tegra_pcie_phy_power_on(pcie);
> >>>> - if (err < 0) {
> >>>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to power on PHY(s): %d\n", err);
> >>>> - return err;
> >>>> + if (soc->program_uphy) {
> >>>> + err = tegra_pcie_phy_power_on(pcie);
> >>>> + if (err < 0) {
> >>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to power on PHY(s): %d\n", err);
> >>>> + return err;
> >>>> + }
> >>>
> >>> This looks good: it's obvious that the previously-supported devices
> >>> continue to work the same way because you set ".program_uphy = true"
> >>> for them. (It would be even more obvious if you changed the sense so
> >>> that only the new device had to add this initializaer, but in general
> >>> I prefer the positive logic as you have here, and I did verify that
> >>> you added the initializer for all tegra_pcie_soc variants.)
> >>>
> >>>> @@ -1048,19 +1054,23 @@ static int tegra_pcie_enable_controller(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> >>>> static void tegra_pcie_power_off(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> >>>> + const struct tegra_pcie_soc *soc = pcie->soc;
> >>>> int err;
> >>>>
> >>>> /* TODO: disable and unprepare clocks? */
> >>>>
> >>>> - err = tegra_pcie_phy_power_off(pcie);
> >>>> - if (err < 0)
> >>>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to power off PHY(s): %d\n", err);
> >>>> + if (soc->program_uphy) {
> >>>> + err = tegra_pcie_phy_power_off(pcie);
> >>>> + if (err < 0)
> >>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to power off PHY(s): %d\n", err);
> >>>> + }
> >>>>
> >>>> reset_control_assert(pcie->pcie_xrst);
> >>>> reset_control_assert(pcie->afi_rst);
> >>>> reset_control_assert(pcie->pex_rst);
> >>>>
> >>>> - tegra_powergate_power_off(TEGRA_POWERGATE_PCIE);
> >>>> + if (!dev->pm_domain)
> >>>> + tegra_powergate_power_off(TEGRA_POWERGATE_PCIE);
> >>>
> >>> But this one isn't obvious because nothing in your patch obviously
> >>> affects dev->pm_domain, so I can't tell whether this is safe. It's
> >>> worth a changelog comment to help justify this.
> >>
> >> The last sentence in the commit message is what this is about. Maybe it
> >> should be more verbose:
> >>
> >> Since the BPMP controls the powergates on Tegra186, there is no
> >> need to manually power on and off the PCIe power partition. The
> >> BPMP generic power domain driver takes care of it instead.
> >
> > If you know Tegra intimately, maybe that clarifies it. I don't, so my
> > problem is that there's nothing in the patch that helps me verify
> > this. I infer that maybe there's something different in the DT that
> > means dev->pm_domain will be set for Tegra186, but not for other
> > variants?
> >
> > There should be something that helps the reader connect the dots.
>
> Till tegra210 pmc driver provides direct powergate power ON/OFF functions.
>
> In tegra186.dtsi power-domains property is added in pcie@10003000 DT node. reference: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/819113/
> powergate-bpmp.c is the pm domain provider for pcie powergate.
> Platform driver will look for pm domain provider of Tegra pcie host driver and sets dev->pm_domains.
> powergate-bpmp.c driver registers powergate power ON/OFF functions to generic PD power_on/powerr_off callback functions.
> Generic power domain will take care of calling power_on before Tegra PCIe probe.
>
> So in this patch I used dev->pm_domain to skip pmc driver calls.
Thanks, I updated the changelog as follows:
commit 9cea513d8cbc75ee26327d3d8971fe7b58288d8f
Author: Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Sep 27 17:28:35 2017 +0530
PCI: tegra: Add Tegra186 PCIe support
Add Tegra186 PCIe support. UPHY programming is performed by BPMP; PHY
enable calls are not required for Tegra186 PCIe.
Power partition ungate is done by BPMP powergate driver. The Tegra186
DT description must include a "power-domains" property, which results in
dev->pm_domain being set.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
