On 26/09/17 00:22, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > Document DT bindings for NVIDIA Tegra AHB DMA controller that presents > on Tegra20/30 SoC's. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/dma/nvidia,tegra20-ahbdma.txt | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/nvidia,tegra20-ahbdma.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/nvidia,tegra20-ahbdma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/nvidia,tegra20-ahbdma.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..2af9aa76ae11 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/nvidia,tegra20-ahbdma.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ > +* NVIDIA Tegra AHB DMA controller > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: Must be "nvidia,tegra20-ahbdma" > +- reg: Should contain registers base address and length. > +- interrupts: Should contain one entry, DMA controller interrupt. > +- clocks: Should contain one entry, DMA controller clock. > +- resets : Should contain one entry, DMA controller reset. > +- #dma-cells: Should be <1>. The cell represents DMA request select value > + for the peripheral. For more details consult the Tegra TRM's > + documentation, in particular AHB DMA channel control register > + REQ_SEL field. What about the TRIG_SEL field? Do we need to handle this here as well? Cheers Jon -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
