On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> On 08/09/17 21:50, Brian Norris wrote:
> > From: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > pkt_xfer should be used for protocol v3, and cmd_xfer otherwise. We had
> > one instance of these functions correct, but not the second, fall-back
> > case. We use the fall-back only when the first command returns an
> > IN_PROGRESS status, which is only used on some EC firmwares where we
> > don't want to constantly poll the bus, but instead back off and
> > sleep/retry for a little while.
> >
> > Fixes: 2c7589af3c4d ("mfd: cros_ec: add proto v3 skeleton")
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > * Added Javier's reviewed tag
> > * It's been > 8 months since [1], so why not? And hey, Benson's officially in
> > MAINTAINERS now! Too bad no one told me.
> >
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9450633/
> >
> >
> > v2:
> > * Add Benson in 'To:'
> > * make subject prefix more obvious
> >
> > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> > index 8dfa7fcb1248..e7bbdf947bbc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> > @@ -60,12 +60,14 @@ static int send_command(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> > struct cros_ec_command *msg)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > + int (*xfer_fxn)(struct cros_ec_device *ec, struct cros_ec_command *msg);
> >
> > if (ec_dev->proto_version > 2)
> > - ret = ec_dev->pkt_xfer(ec_dev, msg);
> > + xfer_fxn = ec_dev->pkt_xfer;
> > else
> > - ret = ec_dev->cmd_xfer(ec_dev, msg);
> > + xfer_fxn = ec_dev->cmd_xfer;
> >
> > + ret = (*xfer_fxn)(ec_dev, msg);
> > if (msg->result == EC_RES_IN_PROGRESS) {
> > int i;
> > struct cros_ec_command *status_msg;
> > @@ -88,7 +90,7 @@ static int send_command(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> > for (i = 0; i < EC_COMMAND_RETRIES; i++) {
> > usleep_range(10000, 11000);
> >
> > - ret = ec_dev->cmd_xfer(ec_dev, status_msg);
> > + ret = (*xfer_fxn)(ec_dev, status_msg);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > break;
> >
>
> Tegra124 Nyan-Big is currently crashing during boot with -next [0] and
> bisect is pointing to this commit. Reverting the above on top of -next
> does allow the board to boot successfully. Looks like this board is
> proto_version 3 but I have not looked into this any further. Let me know
> if you have any thoughts.
Thanks for the bug report, I'll look into this today.
> [ 1.502497] kernel BUG at drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c:34!
> 34 BUG_ON(ec_dev->proto_version != EC_HOST_REQUEST_VERSION);
So, ec_dev->proto_version > 3? That doesn't seem right.
>
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
> [0]
> https://nvtb.github.io//linux-next/test_next-20170919/20170918213034/boot/tegra124-nyan-big/tegra124-nyan-big/tegra_defconfig_log.txt
>
>
> --
> nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
