Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpu: host1x: Enable Tegra186 syncpoint protection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 08/19/2017 01:36 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
On 18.08.2017 19:15, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
Since Tegra186 the Host1x hardware allows syncpoints to be assigned to
specific channels, preventing any other channels from incrementing
them.

Enable this feature where available and assign syncpoints to channels
when submitting a job. Syncpoints are currently never unassigned from
channels since that would require extra work and is unnecessary with
the current channel allocation model.

Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.h           | 16 ++++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/channel_hw.c |  3 +++
  drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/syncpt_hw.c  | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/host1x/syncpt.c        |  3 +++
  4 files changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.h b/drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.h
index def802c0a6bf..2432a30ff6e2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.h
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ struct host1x_syncpt_ops {
  	u32 (*load)(struct host1x_syncpt *syncpt);
  	int (*cpu_incr)(struct host1x_syncpt *syncpt);
  	int (*patch_wait)(struct host1x_syncpt *syncpt, void *patch_addr);
+	void (*assign_channel)(struct host1x_syncpt *syncpt,
+	                       struct host1x_channel *channel);
+	void (*set_protection)(struct host1x *host, bool enabled);
  };
struct host1x_intr_ops {
@@ -186,6 +189,19 @@ static inline int host1x_hw_syncpt_patch_wait(struct host1x *host,
  	return host->syncpt_op->patch_wait(sp, patch_addr);
  }
+static inline void host1x_hw_syncpt_assign_channel(struct host1x *host,
+						   struct host1x_syncpt *sp,
+						   struct host1x_channel *ch)
+{
+	return host->syncpt_op->assign_channel(sp, ch);
+}
+
+static inline void host1x_hw_syncpt_set_protection(struct host1x *host,
+						   bool enabled)
+{
+	return host->syncpt_op->set_protection(host, enabled);
+}
+
  static inline int host1x_hw_intr_init_host_sync(struct host1x *host, u32 cpm,
  			void (*syncpt_thresh_work)(struct work_struct *))
  {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/channel_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/channel_hw.c
index 8447a56c41ca..0161da331702 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/channel_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/channel_hw.c
@@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ static int channel_submit(struct host1x_job *job)
syncval = host1x_syncpt_incr_max(sp, user_syncpt_incrs); + /* assign syncpoint to channel */
+	host1x_hw_syncpt_assign_channel(host, sp, ch);
+
  	job->syncpt_end = syncval;
/* add a setclass for modules that require it */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/syncpt_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/syncpt_hw.c
index 7b0270d60742..5d117ab1699e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/syncpt_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/hw/syncpt_hw.c
@@ -106,6 +106,30 @@ static int syncpt_patch_wait(struct host1x_syncpt *sp, void *patch_addr)
  	return 0;
  }
+static void syncpt_assign_channel(struct host1x_syncpt *sp,
+				  struct host1x_channel *ch)
+{
+#if HOST1X_HW >= 6
+	struct host1x *host = sp->host;
+
+	if (!host->hv_regs)
+		return;
+
+	host1x_sync_writel(host,
+			   HOST1X_SYNC_SYNCPT_CH_APP_CH(ch ? ch->id : 0xff),
+			   HOST1X_SYNC_SYNCPT_CH_APP(sp->id));
+#endif
+}
+
+static void syncpt_set_protection(struct host1x *host, bool enabled)
+{
+#if HOST1X_HW >= 6
+	host1x_hypervisor_writel(host,
+				 enabled ? HOST1X_HV_SYNCPT_PROT_EN_CH_EN : 0,
+				 HOST1X_HV_SYNCPT_PROT_EN);
+#endif
+}
+
  static const struct host1x_syncpt_ops host1x_syncpt_ops = {
  	.restore = syncpt_restore,
  	.restore_wait_base = syncpt_restore_wait_base,
@@ -113,4 +137,6 @@ static const struct host1x_syncpt_ops host1x_syncpt_ops = {
  	.load = syncpt_load,
  	.cpu_incr = syncpt_cpu_incr,
  	.patch_wait = syncpt_patch_wait,
+	.assign_channel = syncpt_assign_channel,
+	.set_protection = syncpt_set_protection,
  };
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/syncpt.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/syncpt.c
index 048ac9e344ce..fe4d963b3e2a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/syncpt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/syncpt.c
@@ -398,6 +398,8 @@ int host1x_syncpt_init(struct host1x *host)
  	for (i = 0; i < host->info->nb_pts; i++) {
  		syncpt[i].id = i;
  		syncpt[i].host = host;
+
+		host1x_hw_syncpt_assign_channel(host, &syncpt[i], NULL);
  	}
for (i = 0; i < host->info->nb_bases; i++)
@@ -408,6 +410,7 @@ int host1x_syncpt_init(struct host1x *host)
  	host->bases = bases;
host1x_syncpt_restore(host);
+	host1x_hw_syncpt_set_protection(host, true);

Is it really okay to force the protection? Maybe protection should be enabled
with a respect to CONFIG_TEGRA_HOST1X_FIREWALL? In that case we would have to
avoid software jobs validation for Tegra124+.

I don't quite get your comment. The hardware syncpt protection layer being enabled should never hurt - it doesn't mess with any valid jobs. It's also only on Tegra186 so I'm not sure where the Tegra124 comes from.

Cheers,
Mikko


/* Allocate sync point to use for clearing waits for expired fences */
  	host->nop_sp = host1x_syncpt_alloc(host, NULL, 0);



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux