Am Donnerstag, 6. Juli 2017, 20:00:02 CEST schrieb Stephen Warren:
> On 07/06/2017 10:57 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > On 06.07.2017 19:38, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 07/05/2017 11:19 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>> Override the compatible string of the first USB controller to enable
> >>> device mode.
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-paz00.dts
> >>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-paz00.dts
> >>>
> >>> usb@c5000000 {
> >>>
> >>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-udc";
> >>>
> >>> status = "okay";
> >>>
> >>> + dr_mode = "otg";
> >>>
> >>> };
> >>
> >> This port is the only external USB port on the AC100.
> >
> > Seems that's not true. http://elinux.org/Tegra/Boards/Toshiba_AC100 claims
> > that there are host and micro USB ports.
>
> You're right; I was getting this board confused with the Springbank
> variety of Seaboard, and when I looked at the mini USB port on the AC100
> I thought it was something else.
Sorry, for the late reply, I'm on vacation.
> Given the physical connector on this USB port on the AC100, it's
> probably fine to convert it to device-mode only since I don't expect
> anyone has a USB OTG cable that has a mini size connector on the host end.
>
> It looks like this port is only enabled because the very first version
> of tegra-paz00.dts didn't explicitly disable the port, and when
> tegra20.dtsi was updated to disable all USB ports by default,
> tegra-paz00.dtsi was updated to enable the port so that the DT change
> didn't affect behaviour, which then left the port enabled explicitly
> albeit without much reason.
I think someone used it in the past in host mode and it was working, but I
think everyone will be happy to have it operating as client only (as original
intended), especially because we already have an external (and also an
internal) usb port.
> So, once the dr_mode is fixed in this change, it's:
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Marc Dietrich <marvin24@xxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
