On 30/06/17 08:22, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Print and propagate the return value of platform_get_irq on failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
> index 214fff9..ae71215 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
> @@ -688,9 +688,9 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (irq <= 0) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get IRQ\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (irq < 0) {
The changelog does not describe the above change and if/why this is ok.
However, the original test looks fine to me and so I don't see a need to
change this.
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", irq);
> + return irq;
Why not have ...
return irq ? irq : -ENODEV;
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
