On 08/19/2016 11:32 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
From: Joseph Lo <josephl@xxxxxxxxxx>
This adds the initial support of Tegra186 SoC. It provides enough to
enable the serial console and boot from an initial ramdisk.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
+ bpmp: bpmp {
+ compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-bpmp";
+ mboxes = <&hsp_top0 TEGRA_HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB
+ TEGRA_HSP_DB_MASTER_BPMP>;
+ shmem = <&cpu_bpmp_tx &cpu_bpmp_rx>;
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ #reset-cells = <1>;
+
+ bpmp_i2c: i2c {
+ compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-bpmp-i2c";
+ nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp>;
+ nvidia,bpmp-bus-id = <5>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+ };
Back on 7/20, Rob Herring wrote:
Just 'i2c' here. With that:
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
... but this series doesn't yet include the BPMP I2C bindings (they've
been ack'd so I assume they'll be applied right after this series is).
Is it better to leave out the I2C sub-node until after the bindings are
applied, or doesn't the order matter too?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
