On 07/28/2016 08:18 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:06:41PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 05:00:56PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi Bjorn,
The following changes since commit 1a695a905c18548062509178b98bc91e67510864:
Linux 4.7-rc1 (2016-05-29 09:29:24 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux.git tags/tegra-for-4.8-pci
for you to fetch changes up to 0f32700faed919946e21e9d1dc4d74ae8f1b1226:
PCI: tegra: Correctly program PADS_REFCLK_CFG* registers (2016-06-30 15:30:16 +0200)
There's a minor conflict between this and your pci/host-request-windows
branch, let me know if you'd like me to rebase on top of that.
Thierry
----------------------------------------------------------------
PCI: tegra: Changes for v4.8-rc1
A couple of cleanups and preparation work for 64-bit ARM support, as
well as fixes for writing the PADS_REFCLK_CFG* registers.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Warren (2):
PCI: tegra: Actually program PADS_REFCLK_CFG* on recent SoCs
I don't see this patch on the list. I'll attach it below for
completeness.
I don't think the original changelog is quite right; I don't see
tegra_xusb_phy_enable() being involved at all. I replaced it with the
following:
PCI: tegra: Program PADS_REFCLK_CFG* always, not just on legacy SoCs
tegra_pcie_phy_power_on() calls tegra_pcie_phy_enable() only for legacy
SoCs. However, part of tegra_pcie_phy_enable() needs to happen in all
cases. Move that code up one level into tegra_pcie_phy_power_on().
Here's the original commit from your git tree:
commit 0ad9be61b5af
Author: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Jun 24 08:37:03 2016 -0600
PCI: tegra: Actually program PADS_REFCLK_CFG* on recent SoCs
On recent SoCs, tegra_pcie_phy_enable() isn't called; but instead
tegra_pcie_enable_controller() calls tegra_xusb_phy_enable(). However,
part of tegra_pcie_phy_enable() needs to happen in all cases. Move that
code up one level into tegra_pcie_phy_power_on().
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
Yeah, that's fine. Thanks. FWIW, the reason why you don't see this on
the list is probably because it is the same patch that was merged into
U-Boot a few days earlier, which is also the reason why the commit
message isn't quite right. I thought I had sanitized it, but evidently
had missed the function name change.
Oops. Looks like I sent it to the Tegra and ARM mailing lists and forgot
the PCI mailing list:-( Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
