On 07/06/2016 03:05 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Joseph Lo <josephl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Tegra HSP mailbox driver implements the signaling doorbell-based
interprocessor communication (IPC) for remote processors currently. The
HSP HW modules support some different features for that, which are
shared mailboxes, shared semaphores, arbitrated semaphores, and
doorbells. And there are multiple HSP HW instances on the chip. So the
driver is extendable to support more features for different IPC
requirement.
The driver of remote processor can use it as a mailbox client and deal
with the IPC protocol to synchronize the data communications.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in V2:
- Update the driver to support the binding changes in V2
- it's extendable to support multiple HSP sub-modules on the same HSP HW block
now.
---
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c | 418 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 429 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
index 5305923752d2..fe584cb54720 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
@@ -114,6 +114,15 @@ config MAILBOX_TEST
Test client to help with testing new Controller driver
implementations.
+config TEGRA_HSP_MBOX
+ bool "Tegra HSP(Hardware Synchronization Primitives) Driver"
Space missing before the opening parenthesis (same in the patch title btw).
Okay.
+ depends on ARCH_TEGRA_186_SOC
+ help
+ The Tegra HSP driver is used for the interprocessor communication
+ between different remote processors and host processors on Tegra186
+ and later SoCs. Say Y here if you want to have this support.
+ If unsure say N.
Since this option is selected automatically by ARCH_TEGRA_186_SOC, you
should probably drop the last 2 sentences.
Okay.
+
config XGENE_SLIMPRO_MBOX
tristate "APM SoC X-Gene SLIMpro Mailbox Controller"
depends on ARCH_XGENE
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
index 0be3e742bb7d..26d8f91c7fea 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
@@ -25,3 +25,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TI_MESSAGE_MANAGER) += ti-msgmgr.o
obj-$(CONFIG_XGENE_SLIMPRO_MBOX) += mailbox-xgene-slimpro.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HI6220_MBOX) += hi6220-mailbox.o
+
+obj-${CONFIG_TEGRA_HSP_MBOX} += tegra-hsp.o
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c b/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..93c3ef58f29f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,418 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2016, NVIDIA CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
+ * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
+ * more details.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/mailbox/tegra186-hsp.h>
+
+#define HSP_INT_DIMENSIONING 0x380
+#define HSP_nSM_OFFSET 0
+#define HSP_nSS_OFFSET 4
+#define HSP_nAS_OFFSET 8
+#define HSP_nDB_OFFSET 12
+#define HSP_nSI_OFFSET 16
Would be nice to have comments to understand what SM, SS, AS, etc.
stand for (Shared Mailboxes, Shared Semaphores, Arbitrated Semaphores
but you need to look at the patch description to understand that). A
top-of-file comment explaning the necessary concepts to read this code
would do the trick.
Yes, will fix that.
+#define HSP_nINT_MASK 0xf
+
+#define HSP_DB_REG_TRIGGER 0x0
+#define HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE 0x4
+#define HSP_DB_REG_RAW 0x8
+#define HSP_DB_REG_PENDING 0xc
+
+#define HSP_DB_CCPLEX 1
+#define HSP_DB_BPMP 3
Maybe turn this into enum and use that type for
tegra_hsp_db_chan::db_id? Also have MAX_NUM_HSP_DB here, since it is
related to these values?
Okay.
+
+#define MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN 32
+#define MAX_NUM_HSP_DB 7
+
+#define hsp_db_offset(i, d) \
+ (d->base + ((1 + (d->nr_sm >> 1) + d->nr_ss + d->nr_as) << 16) + \
+ (i) * 0x100)
+
+struct tegra_hsp_db_chan {
+ int master_id;
+ int db_id;
+};
+
+struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan {
+ int type;
+ union {
+ struct tegra_hsp_db_chan db_chan;
+ };
+};
+
+struct tegra_hsp_mbox {
+ struct mbox_controller *mbox;
+ void __iomem *base;
+ void __iomem *db_base[MAX_NUM_HSP_DB];
+ int db_irq;
+ int nr_sm;
+ int nr_as;
+ int nr_ss;
+ int nr_db;
+ int nr_si;
+ spinlock_t lock;
+};
+
+static inline u32 hsp_readl(void __iomem *base, int reg)
+{
+ return readl(base + reg);
+}
+
+static inline void hsp_writel(void __iomem *base, int reg, u32 val)
+{
+ writel(val, base + reg);
+ readl(base + reg);
+}
+
+static int hsp_db_can_ring(void __iomem *db_base)
+{
+ u32 reg;
+
+ reg = hsp_readl(db_base, HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
+
+ return !!(reg & BIT(HSP_DB_MASTER_CCPLEX));
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t hsp_db_irq(int irq, void *p)
+{
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = p;
+ ulong val;
+ int master_id;
+
+ val = (ulong)hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX],
+ HSP_DB_REG_PENDING);
+ hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_PENDING, val);
+
+ spin_lock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
+ for_each_set_bit(master_id, &val, MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN) {
+ struct mbox_chan *chan;
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN; i++) {
I wonder if this could not be optimized. You are doing a double loop
on MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN to look for an identical master_id. Since it seems
like the same master_id cannot be used twice (considering that the
inner loop only processes the first match), couldn't you just select
the free channel in of_hsp_mbox_xlate() by doing
&mbox->chans[master_id] (and returning an error if it is already
used), then simply getting chan as &hsp_mbox->mbox->chans[master_id]
instead of having the inner loop below? That would remove the need for
the second loop.
That was exactly what I did in the V1, which only supported one HSP
sub-module per HSP HW block. So we can just use the master_id as the
mbox channel ID.
Meanwhile, the V2 is purposed to support multiple HSP sub-modules to be
running on the same HSP HW block. The "ID" between different modules
could be conflict. So I dropped the mechanism that used the master_id as
the mbox channel ID.
Instead, the channel is allocated at the time, when the client is bound
to one of the HSP sub-modules. And we store the "ID" information into
the private mbox channel data, which can help us to figure out which
mbox channel should response to the interrupt.
In the doorbell case, because all the DB clients are shared the same DB
IRQ at the CPU side. So in the ISR, we need to figure out the IRQ
source, which is the master_id that the IRQ came from. This is the outer
loop. The inner loop, we figure out which channel should response to by
checking the type and ID.
And I think it should be pretty quick, because we only check the set bit
from the pending register. And finding the matching channel.
If having two channels use the same master_id is a valid scenario,
then all matches on master_id should probably be processed, not just
the first one.
Each DB channel should have different master_id.
+ chan = &hsp_mbox->mbox->chans[i];
+
+ if (!chan->con_priv)
+ continue;
+
+ mchan = chan->con_priv;
+ if (mchan->type == HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB &&
+ mchan->db_chan.master_id == master_id)
+ break;
+ chan = NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (chan)
+ mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int hsp_db_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
+{
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
+ struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
+
+ hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[db_chan->db_id], HSP_DB_REG_TRIGGER, 1);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int hsp_db_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
+ struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
+ u32 val;
+ unsigned long flag;
+
+ if (db_chan->master_id >= MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN) {
+ dev_err(chan->mbox->dev, "invalid HSP chan: master ID: %d\n",
+ db_chan->master_id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
+ val = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
+ val |= BIT(db_chan->master_id);
+ hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE, val);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
+
+ if (!hsp_db_can_ring(hsp_mbox->db_base[db_chan->db_id]))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void hsp_db_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
+ struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
+ u32 val;
+ unsigned long flag;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
+ val = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
+ val &= ~BIT(db_chan->master_id);
+ hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE, val);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
+}
+
+static bool hsp_db_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
+static int tegra_hsp_db_init(struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox,
+ struct mbox_chan *mchan, int master_id)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(hsp_mbox->mbox->dev);
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!hsp_mbox->db_irq) {
+ int i;
+
+ hsp_mbox->db_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "doorbell");
Getting the IRQ sounds more like a job for probe() - I don't see the
benefit of lazy-doing it?
We only need the IRQ when the client is requesting the DB service. For
other HSP sub-modules, they are using different IRQ. So I didn't do that
at probe time.
+ ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, hsp_mbox->db_irq,
+ hsp_db_irq, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
+ dev_name(&pdev->dev), hsp_mbox);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_HSP_DB; i++)
+ hsp_mbox->db_base[i] = hsp_db_offset(i, hsp_mbox);
Same here, cannot this be moved into probe()?
Same as above, only needed when the client requests it.
+ }
+
+ hsp_mbox_chan = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hsp_mbox_chan),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!hsp_mbox_chan)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ hsp_mbox_chan->type = HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB;
+ hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.master_id = master_id;
+ switch (master_id) {
+ case HSP_DB_MASTER_BPMP:
+ hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.db_id = HSP_DB_BPMP;
+ break;
+ default:
+ hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.db_id = MAX_NUM_HSP_DB;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ mchan->con_priv = hsp_mbox_chan;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int hsp_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
+{
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
+ case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
+ ret = hsp_db_send_data(chan, data);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int hsp_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
+ case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
+ ret = hsp_db_startup(chan);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void hsp_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
+
+ switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
+ case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
+ hsp_db_shutdown(chan);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ chan->con_priv = NULL;
+}
+
+static bool hsp_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
+{
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
+ bool ret = true;
+
+ switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
+ case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
+ ret = hsp_db_last_tx_done(chan);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct mbox_chan_ops tegra_hsp_ops = {
+ .send_data = hsp_send_data,
+ .startup = hsp_startup,
+ .shutdown = hsp_shutdown,
+ .last_tx_done = hsp_last_tx_done,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id tegra_hsp_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-hsp" },
+ { }
+};
+
+static struct mbox_chan *
+of_hsp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
+ const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
+{
+ int mbox_id = sp->args[0];
+ int hsp_type = (mbox_id >> 16) & 0xf;
+ int master_id = mbox_id & 0xff;
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(mbox->dev);
+ struct mbox_chan *free_chan;
+ int i, ret = 0;
+
+ spin_lock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mbox->num_chans; i++) {
+ free_chan = &mbox->chans[i];
+ if (!free_chan->con_priv)
+ break;
+ free_chan = NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (!free_chan) {
+ spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
+ }
+
+ switch (hsp_type) {
+ case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
+ ret = tegra_hsp_db_init(hsp_mbox, free_chan, master_id);
Maybe move tegra_hsp_db_init's definition closer to this function,
since it is only used here? Having related functions close to one
another makes it easier to understand the code.
Okay.
+ break;
+ default:
This looks like an error condition - it should probably be reported,
and maybe even an error returned. If you do it here you probably don't
need to do the same check in hsp_send_data() and following functions.
Yes, will fix.
+ break;
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
+
+ if (ret)
+ free_chan = ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
+
+ return free_chan;
+}
+
+static int tegra_hsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox;
+ struct resource *res;
+ int ret = 0;
+ u32 reg;
+
+ hsp_mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hsp_mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!hsp_mbox)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ hsp_mbox->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(hsp_mbox->base))
+ return PTR_ERR(hsp_mbox->base);
+
+ reg = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->base, HSP_INT_DIMENSIONING);
+ hsp_mbox->nr_sm = (reg >> HSP_nSM_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
+ hsp_mbox->nr_ss = (reg >> HSP_nSS_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
+ hsp_mbox->nr_as = (reg >> HSP_nAS_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
+ hsp_mbox->nr_db = (reg >> HSP_nDB_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
+ hsp_mbox->nr_si = (reg >> HSP_nSI_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
Maybe have a HSP_NR(type, reg) that expands to (reg >> HSP_n ## TYPE
## _OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK) to simplify this?
Good suggestion, will fix.
Thanks,
-Joseph
+
+ hsp_mbox->mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(*hsp_mbox->mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!hsp_mbox->mbox)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ hsp_mbox->mbox->chans =
+ devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN,
+ sizeof(*hsp_mbox->mbox->chans), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!hsp_mbox->mbox->chans)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ hsp_mbox->mbox->of_xlate = of_hsp_mbox_xlate;
+ hsp_mbox->mbox->num_chans = MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN;
+ hsp_mbox->mbox->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ hsp_mbox->mbox->txdone_irq = false;
+ hsp_mbox->mbox->txdone_poll = false;
+ hsp_mbox->mbox->ops = &tegra_hsp_ops;
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hsp_mbox);
+
+ ret = mbox_controller_register(hsp_mbox->mbox);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("tegra-hsp mbox: fail to register mailbox %d.\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_init(&hsp_mbox->lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int tegra_hsp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ if (hsp_mbox->mbox)
+ mbox_controller_unregister(hsp_mbox->mbox);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver tegra_hsp_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "tegra-hsp",
+ .of_match_table = tegra_hsp_match,
+ },
+ .probe = tegra_hsp_probe,
+ .remove = tegra_hsp_remove,
+};
+
+static int __init tegra_hsp_init(void)
+{
+ return platform_driver_register(&tegra_hsp_driver);
+}
+core_initcall(tegra_hsp_init);
--
2.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
