On Friday, July 1, 2016 3:52:44 PM CEST Liviu Dudau wrote: > > > > > or do you mean we should have extra alignment in there so the > > private pointer has a minimum alignment higher than the > > alignment of struct pci_host_bridge? > > but this ^. bridge pointer arithmetic means +1 is not necessarily +sizeof(struct pci_host_bridge) > bytes. AFAIK that can be rounded to the nearest natural alignment for pointers on that > architecture. No, that's not how it works. > > I'm absolutely fine with any of those suggestions, whichever > > makes the nicest API. > > Does anyone need to subclass the pci_host_bridge structure? And is appending data right > after the structure useful? I was basically following the way alloc_etherdev() and a lot of other subsystems handle it. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
