On 05/06/2016 05:15 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 04/22, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:31:05PM +0800, Penny Chiu wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/nvidia,tegra-dfll-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/nvidia,tegra-dfll-pwm.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bd0d247
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/nvidia,tegra-dfll-pwm.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+Tegra SoC DFLL PWM controller
Stephen, we have in the past used tegra124 in names, even if the IP was
already included in tegra114, but we never supported it on Tegra114 and
hence couldn't even verify that the binding was valid. Any preference as
to the name in this particular case?
You meant Stephen Warren right? I don't care either way.
Sorry, I wasn't really paying attention to patches.
Yes, using "124" seems to make sense; we can always expand the binding
to cover "114" later if there's any demand.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
