On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 03:44:24PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 22/04/16 14:53, Mark Brown wrote: > > We need to only *fail* in the bypass case. > OK. So this is what I have now. Is it weird to return EPROBE_DEFER in > _regulator_get_voltage()? If so, I could add a test for bypass in the > regulator_register(). It should be fine but perhaps print an error saying that it's a bypassed regulator with no supply? Deferring for no explicit reason can be confusing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
