On 4/7/2016 4:45 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/07/2016 02:35 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote: >> On 4/7/2016 4:30 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 04/06/2016 03:33 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote: >>>> Tegra210-smaug is the name for the Google Pixel C platform. >>> >>> I assume tegra210-smaug.dts is the DT filename that will appear in the >>> mainline kernel, and the board name that will appear in U-Boot if U-Boot >>> gets ported? In the past there have been disconnects between what Google >>> wanted to call boards and what NVIDIA called boards. I'd like to avoid >>> applying this and having to renaming everything later, if possible. >> >> Tegra210-smaug is the chosen kernel dt name for this board. That was >> approved by Google before posting to the kernel. I believe therefore >> that we should be fine to expect that name to be consistent between >> kernel/uboot/etc. > > Great:-) > >>> Does this table content match the production SW stack, and our Excel >>> pinmux spreadsheet? >> >> Right now this matches the production SW stack. It has some variances >> with the latest Excel pinmux spreadsheets, and I am working on trying to >> verify that these are correct vs those, or vice-versa. > > OK, if it matches the existing SW, that's probably good enough to just > apply this. Do you want me to wait for V2, or just go ahead and apply it > now? I imagine it might take a while to track down the differences, and > the production SW works, so the configuration it's using obviously at > least works even if it isn't perfect... > I think, based on the fact that it is matching the existing production values, it should be good. If I eventually turn up differences, they will likely need to go to both places, so I will be making a patch anyway. So I say apply it. -rhyland -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
