On 04/06/2016 11:28 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 01:25:07PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
According to the Tegra TRM, GPIOs are aggregated into /ports/ of 8 GPIOs,
not into /banks/. Fix <dt-bindings/gpio/tegra-gpio.h> to correctly reflect
this naming convention. While this seems like silly churn, it will become
slightly more important once we introduce the GPIO binding for upcoming
Tegra chips.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/dt-bindings/gpio/tegra-gpio.h | 68 +++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
It's not clear to me where this should be applied. This is technically
part of the GPIO controller bindings, in which case it'd need to go via
the GPIO tree. I'm fine with taking it through the Tegra tree, too, but
in case you agree that it should go through the GPIO tree:
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
I typically consider bindings part of the SoC code-base they related to,
so I'd imagine this going through the Tegra tree. I didn't Cc LinusW on
the patch because of that thinking and oversight, but have done so now
just in case he feels strongly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
