On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 18:35 -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:08:00PM +0000, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 11:12 -0700, Srikar Srimath Tirumala wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > The complexity of such communication (or even the current status of > sysfs ABI) starts to reach limit of such channel. We may definitely > consider other means, such as /dev interface, just like IIO does. Yes. Instead of loading netlink I/F, we need to have thermal channel to notify. > > During last LPC we discussed about using IIO for temperature > > threshold > > notifications and I submitted multiple changes for that. Looks like > > we > > also care of trip point changes. So I think we need more > > comprehensive > > mechanism to address this. > > > > May be we should have thermal mini summit during LPC again and > > decide a > > comprehensive plan to address all asynchronous thermal > > notifications. > > > I have created a wiki for LPC 2016 > http://wiki.linuxplumbersconf.org/2016:thermal > > Overall I believe we need to solve the (temperature) sensing in a > more > structured way within the kernel. We have three subsystem that allow > performing temperature sensing. They are different in design and > concept, but still solve similar problems. > > Again, please lets generate enough quorum to run the micro conf. > I am planning to attend. Thanks, Srinivas > BR, > > Eduardo Valentin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
