Hi Uffe, On 04/03/16 12:33, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 4 March 2016 at 12:23, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> In order to safely remove PM domains there are a few changes that need to be >> made to ensure that no one is holding an external reference to a PM domain >> after it has been removed. One solution, implemented here, solves this by >> eliminating external references to PM domain. Another alternative would be >> to employ some reference counting for the PM domains, however, I did not see >> a good reason for allowing external references in the first place (as always >> there could be something that I have over-looked!). >> >> Jon Hunter (8): >> PM / Domains: Add new helper functions for device-tree >> ARM: EXYNOS: Remove calls to of_genpd_get_from_provider() >> staging: board: Remove calls to of_genpd_get_from_provider() >> PM / Domains: Don't expose generic_pm_domain structure >> PM / Domains: Verify the PM domain is present when adding a provider >> PM / Domains: Remove a provider by referencing the data pointer >> PM / Domains: Prepare for adding support to remove PM domains >> PM / Domains: Add support for removing PM domains >> >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c | 23 +-- >> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 324 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> drivers/staging/board/board.c | 9 +- >> include/linux/pm_domain.h | 55 ++++--- >> 4 files changed, 348 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.1.4 >> > > Jon, thanks for posting this! > My initial impressions is the I like the ideas for where you moves this. > > I will review it in more details as soon as I can (travelling next week). Just wanted to see if you have had chance to look at this yet? Not urgent. Cheers Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
