On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 02:59:52PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote: > > > On 2016年03月15日 02:57, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:10:25AM +0800, Wei Ni wrote: > >> Add Tegra210 specific SOC_THERM driver. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/thermal/tegra/Makefile | 1 + > >> drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm-fuse.c | 11 ++ > >> drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c | 6 ++ > >> drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.h | 4 + > >> drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra210-soctherm.c | 173 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > No Kconfig change? > > Yes, we doesn't need Kconfig change. > > As discussed with Thierry in [V1,03/10] thermal: tegra: split tegra_soctherm > driver, he said: > "I'd like to do this differently to reduce the number of Kconfig symbols. > The alternate proposal would be for the TEGRA_SOCTHERM symbol to remain > as it is and then build in driver support depending on the selected > ARCH_TEGRA_*_SOC options." > > So we only have "config TEGRA_SOCTHERM" in the Kconfig, and in Makefile, we add > tegra-soctherm-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC) += tegra124-soctherm.o > tegra-soctherm-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC) += tegra210-soctherm.o makes sense to me.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
