On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:48:35PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > Commit 30e7a65b3fdb ("PM / Domains: Ensure subdomain is not in use > before removing") added a test to ensure that a subdomain is not is not Double "is not". > a master to another subdomain or if any devices are using the subdomain > before removing. This change incorrectly used the "slave_links" list to > determine if the subdomain is a master to another subdomain, where it > should have been using the "master_links" list instead. The > "slave_links" list will never be empty for a subdomain and so a > subdomain can never be removed. Fix this by testing if the > "master_links" list is empty instead. > > Fixes: 30e7a65b3fdb ("PM / Domains: Ensure subdomain is not in use > before removing") > > Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> I think the Fixes: line is allowed to be longer than 72 characters (the important bits are in the first few characters anyway) and it doesn't need to be separated from other tags by a blank line. That said, I doubt that any of the automation tools will be confused. Other than that, the change looks correct: Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c > index e8ca290dbf9d..ea9f2aa3fc33 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c > @@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ int pm_genpd_remove_subdomain(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, > mutex_lock(&subdomain->lock); > mutex_lock_nested(&genpd->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); > > - if (!list_empty(&subdomain->slave_links) || subdomain->device_count) { > + if (!list_empty(&subdomain->master_links) || subdomain->device_count) { > pr_warn("%s: unable to remove subdomain %s\n", genpd->name, > subdomain->name); > ret = -EBUSY; > -- > 2.1.4 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature