Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v2 2/5] core: add support for secure boot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 21 January 2016 at 12:13, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 01/21/2016 10:09 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Hi Alexandre,
>>>
>>> On 18 January 2016 at 06:10, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>> +static const char *
>>>> +managed_falcons_names[] = {
>>>> +       [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU] = "PMU",
>>>> +       [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_RESERVED] = "<invalid>",
>>> "<reserved>" perhaps ? we already have one invalid below.
>> Does <reserved> really mean: "we don't want to tell you?" here? :)
>>
> That or we have some secret WIP that we're haven't decided if it'll work out :-)

That's just how it appears on our end. :) But since this enum does not
seem to be used by the hardware anyway, I will simply remove the
"_RESERVED" entry. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux