On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 08:40PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On 12/17/2015 12:48 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > > Some IRQ chips may be located in a power domain outside of the CPU > > subsystem and hence will require device specific runtime power management. > > In order to support such IRQ chips, add a pointer for a device structure > > to the irq_chip structure, and if this pointer is populated by the IRQ > > chip driver and the flag CHIP_HAS_RPM is set, then the pm_runtime_get/put > > APIs for this chip will be called when an IRQ is requested/freed, > > respectively. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I've tried to test these patches with OMAP GPIO and I see it works, in general. > "In general" - because OMAP GPIO has some code which is expected to be used > very late during suspend or when entering deep CPUIdle states, so I can't use > this approach "out-of-the-box" until i find the way to sort it out. > > Hope some one else can try to test it with GPIO. Soren? I try to find the person who had the failing test that triggered my involvement. That would basically just cover the case that the GPIO controller is used as IRQ controller and needs to be enabled even if no GPIO has been requested. Suspend/resume may be more difficult. We have some out-of-tree code for that. But unfortunately not 100% stable. I'll check what happens and report back. Thanks, Sören -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
